Screener
EPMV vs DCOR
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF
Key differences
- DCOR costs 0.74% less per year.
- DCOR is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPMV is classified as equity, while DCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EPMV follows a index tracking strategy; DCOR uses multi strategy.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPMV | DCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $3.0B |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.32% | 11.99% |
| Max drawdown | -8.78% | -19.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPMV and DCOR
Explore further