Screener
EPMV vs DFAU
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAU costs 0.76% less per year.
- DFAU is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPMV follows a index tracking strategy; DFAU uses active selection.
- DFAU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPMV | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.1% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.32% | 12.20% |
| Max drawdown | -8.78% | -23.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPMV and DFAU
Explore further