Screener
EPP vs FLJH
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan Hedged ETF
Key differences
- FLJH costs 0.38% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than FLJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPP covers global markets; FLJH covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, FLJH has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPP | FLJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $143M |
| Since | 2001 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 5.23% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +47.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +20.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 18.28% |
| Max drawdown | -39.30% | -31.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPP and FLJH
Explore further