Screener
EPP vs FLAX
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF vs Franklin FTSE Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- FLAX costs 0.28% less per year.
- EPP is significantly larger than FLAX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPP covers global markets; FLAX covers asia pacific.
- Over the last 3 years, FLAX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPP | FLAX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $47M |
| Since | 2001 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 2.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +48.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.1% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 18.62% |
| Max drawdown | -39.30% | -42.51% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPP and FLAX
Explore further