Screener
EPSV vs FNK
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF vs First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FNK costs 0.14% less per year.
- FNK is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FNK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPSV | FNK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.74% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $217M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.7% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.79% | 15.67% |
| Max drawdown | -8.93% | -50.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPSV and FNK
Explore further