Screener
EPSV vs ROAM
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- ROAM costs 0.44% less per year.
- ROAM is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPSV covers north america markets; ROAM covers emerging markets.
- ROAM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPSV | ROAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $106M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.74% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.2% | +50.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.42 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | 14.76% |
| Max drawdown | -8.93% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPSV and ROAM
Explore further