Screener
ROAM vs RODM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF vs Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Key differences
- RODM costs 0.15% less per year.
- RODM is significantly larger than ROAM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ROAM covers emerging markets markets; RODM covers global.
- ROAM follows a index tracking strategy; RODM uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, ROAM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ROAM | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $106M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2015 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 2.81% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.2% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.7% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.33 | 1.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.41% | 10.77% |
| Max drawdown | -45.46% | -35.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ROAM and RODM
Explore further