Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EPV vs XPP

ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

EPV

ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$14M

XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

Key differences

  • EPV is classified as equity, while XPP is cryptocurrency — different risk/return profiles.
  • EPV follows a inverse strategy; XPP uses leveraged.
  • Over the last 3 years, XPP has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EPVXPP
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$14M$11M
Since20092009
Dividend yield4.69%2.43%
Asset classequitycryptocurrency
Regioneurope
Strategyinverseleveraged
CAGR 1Y-30.7%-8.4%
CAGR 3Y-24.4%+5.4%
CAGR 5Y-19.6%-19.1%
Sharpe 3Y-0.850.31
Volatility 1Y31.30%38.82%
Max drawdown-93.61%-89.90%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EPV and XPP