Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

XPP vs UPV

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 vs ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe

XPP

ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$11M

UPV

ProShares Ultra FTSE Europe

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$14M

Key differences

  • XPP is classified as cryptocurrency, while UPV is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • Over the last 3 years, UPV has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

XPPUPV
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$11M$14M
Since20092010
Dividend yield2.43%2.14%
Asset classcryptocurrencyequity
Region
Strategyleveragedleveraged
CAGR 1Y-8.4%+34.9%
CAGR 3Y+5.4%+23.2%
CAGR 5Y-19.1%+9.8%
Sharpe 3Y0.310.71
Volatility 1Y38.82%30.82%
Max drawdown-89.90%-67.25%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to XPP and UPV