Screener
EQAL vs RSPF
Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
- EQAL costs 0.20% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, RSPF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RSPF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQAL | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $797M | $274M |
| Since | 2014 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.66% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.8% | +17.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.40% | 15.10% |
| Max drawdown | -40.44% | -44.80% |
Similar to EQAL and RSPF
Explore further