Screener
EQIN vs CGUS
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS is significantly larger than EQIN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EQIN follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EQIN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQIN | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $276M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +29.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 1.26 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 12.48% |
| Max drawdown | -42.16% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQIN and CGUS
Explore further