Screener
EQIN vs PY
Columbia U.S. Equity Income ETF vs Principal Value ETF
Key differences
- PY costs 0.20% less per year.
- EQIN follows a index tracking strategy; PY uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQIN | PY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $276M | $212M |
| Since | 2016 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.92% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +17.7% | +17.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.3% | +13.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.5% | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.87 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.39% | 10.72% |
| Max drawdown | -42.16% | -45.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQIN and PY
Explore further