Screener
EQWL vs OMFS
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- EQWL costs 0.14% less per year.
- EQWL is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EQWL follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EQWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQWL | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $275M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.50% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -34.30% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQWL and OMFS
Explore further