Screener
EQWL vs OMFL
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- EQWL is classified as equity, while OMFL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- EQWL follows a index tracking strategy; OMFL uses systematic alpha.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EQWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQWL | OMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $4.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 0.78% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +14.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +9.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.50% | 12.16% |
| Max drawdown | -34.30% | -33.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQWL and OMFL
Explore further