Screener
EQWL vs RSPF
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Financials ETF
Key differences
- EQWL costs 0.15% less per year.
- EQWL is significantly larger than RSPF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQWL | RSPF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $274M |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.60% | 1.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.3% | +6.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.2% | +17.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.9% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.50% | 15.08% |
| Max drawdown | -34.30% | -44.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQWL and RSPF
Explore further