Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ESIM vs INTL

Eventide International ETF vs Main International ETF

ESIM

Eventide International ETF

Annual cost

Fund size

INTL

Main International ETF

Main Management ETFs

Annual cost

0.84%

Fund size

$222M

Key differences

  • ESIM is classified as equity, while INTL is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
  • ESIM covers global ex us markets; INTL covers global.
  • ESIM follows a active selection strategy; INTL uses option income.

Side-by-side comparison

ESIMINTL
Annual cost (TER)0.84%
Fund size (AUM)$222M
Since2022
Dividend yield2.37%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionglobal ex usglobal
Strategyactive selectionoption income
CAGR 1YN/A+26.7%
CAGR 3YN/A+16.7%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3YN/A0.85
Volatility 1Y15.26%
Max drawdown-11.26%-14.48%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ESIM and INTL