Screener
ESN vs ADPV
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Adaptiv Select ETF
Key differences
- ESN costs 0.30% less per year.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | ADPV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $171M |
| Since | 2014 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 0.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +36.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | 24.12% |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -22.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESN and ADPV
Explore further