Screener
ESN vs BCFN
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Baron Financials ETF
Key differences
Both ESN and BCFN are equity ETFs. ESN charges 0.70% a year and BCFN 0.80%. The main difference: ESN covers North America; BCFN covers global markets.
- ESN covers North America; BCFN covers global markets.
- ESN costs 0.10% less per year.
- ESN is much larger than BCFN. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | BCFN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $279M | $47M |
| Since | 2014 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -20.95% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.