Screener
ESN vs BCSM
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Baron SMID Cap ETF
Key differences
Both ESN and BCSM are equity ETFs. ESN charges 0.70% a year and BCSM 0.75%. The main difference: ESN costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESN costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESN is much larger than BCSM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | BCSM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $279M | $32M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -17.45% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.