Screener
ESN vs KONG
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- ESN costs 0.19% less per year.
- ESN is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ESN follows a active selection strategy; KONG uses option income.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $22M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +7.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | 10.90% |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -19.98% |
Similar to ESN and KONG
Explore further