Screener
KONG vs SPDF
Formidable Fortress ETF vs Defender Risk Adaptive 500 ETF
Key differences
- SPDF costs 0.20% less per year.
- KONG is significantly larger than SPDF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KONG is classified as alternative, while SPDF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KONG follows a option income strategy; SPDF uses active selection.
- KONG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KONG | SPDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.89% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22M | $5M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.36% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +6.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.98% | -1.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KONG and SPDF
Explore further