Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ESPO vs GDX

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs VanEck Gold Miners ETF

ESPO

VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.55%

Fund size

$257M

GDX

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

VanEck

Annual cost

0.51%

Fund size

$27.3B

Key differences

  • GDX is significantly larger than ESPO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, GDX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • GDX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ESPOGDX
Annual cost (TER)0.55%0.51%
Fund size (AUM)$257M$27.3B
Since20182006
Dividend yield1.40%0.72%
Asset classequityequity
Region
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y-9.7%+70.3%
CAGR 3Y+20.1%+40.1%
CAGR 5Y+7.2%+18.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.801.00
Volatility 1Y19.07%45.53%
Max drawdown-50.99%-49.79%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ESPO and GDX