Screener
ETHU vs SCZ
2x Ether ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCZ costs 2.27% less per year.
- SCZ is significantly larger than ETHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ETHU is classified as cryptocurrency, while SCZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ETHU follows a leveraged strategy; SCZ uses index tracking.
- SCZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ETHU | SCZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.67% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $14.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 3.01% | 3.05% |
| Asset class | cryptocurrency | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -66.7% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 137.39% | 14.50% |
| Max drawdown | -94.05% | -41.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ETHU and SCZ
Explore further