Screener
EURL vs TZA
Direxion Daily FTSE Europe Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.05% less per year.
- TZA is significantly larger than EURL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EURL covers europe markets; TZA covers north america.
- EURL follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EURL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EURL | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.04% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $60M | $270M |
| Since | 2014 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +48.6% | -69.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.5% | -47.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | -32.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.71 | -0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.35% | 57.38% |
| Max drawdown | -84.65% | -99.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EURL and TZA
Explore further