Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EWH vs CNYA

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF vs iShares MSCI China A ETF

EWH

iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$1.1B

CNYA

iShares MSCI China A ETF

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$242M

Key differences

Both EWH and CNYA are equity ETFs. EWH charges 0.50% a year and CNYA 0.60%. The main difference: EWH covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.

  • EWH covers the Asia-Pacific region; CNYA covers emerging markets.
  • EWH costs 0.10% less per year.
  • EWH is much larger than CNYA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EWH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EWHCNYA
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$1.1B$242M
Since19962016
Dividend yield4.78%1.76%
Asset classequityequity
Regionasia pacificemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+18.4%+31.7%
CAGR 3Y+9.7%+10.3%
CAGR 5Y-1.3%-1.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.380.38
Volatility 1Y16.60%17.67%
Max drawdown-42.71%-49.48%

Similar to EWH and CNYA