Screener
EWJ vs AAXJ
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
Key differences
- EWJ costs 0.23% less per year.
- EWJ is significantly larger than AAXJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, AAXJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | AAXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.0B | $3.8B |
| Since | 1996 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 4.08% | 1.54% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.5% | +48.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.0% | +22.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.77% | 19.80% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -44.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWJ and AAXJ
Explore further