Screener
EWJ vs KOKU
iShares MSCI Japan ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EWJ and KOKU are equity ETFs. EWJ charges 0.49% a year and KOKU 0.09%. The main difference: EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- EWJ covers the Asia-Pacific region; KOKU covers global markets.
- KOKU costs 0.40% less per year.
- EWJ is much larger than KOKU. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KOKU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWJ | KOKU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $21.3B | $805M |
| Since | 1996 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 1.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.1% | +22.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.6% | +21.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +11.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.84% | 12.49% |
| Max drawdown | -33.14% | -25.77% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.