Screener
KOKU vs SCJ
Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both KOKU and SCJ are equity ETFs. KOKU charges 0.09% a year and SCJ 0.50%. The main difference: KOKU covers global markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KOKU covers global markets; SCJ covers the Asia-Pacific region.
- KOKU costs 0.41% less per year.
- KOKU is much larger than SCJ. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, KOKU has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SCJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KOKU | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $805M | $245M |
| Since | 2020 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.35% | 2.70% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.1% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.2% | +18.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.8% | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.91 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.49% | 16.22% |
| Max drawdown | -25.77% | -37.28% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.