Screener
EWM vs EZA
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and EZA are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and EZA 0.59%. The main difference: EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last three years, EZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | EZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $693M |
| Since | 1996 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 6.12% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +28.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 31.44% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -62.25% |
Similar to EWM and EZA
Explore further