Screener
EWM vs EEMA
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both EWM and EEMA are equity ETFs. EWM charges 0.50% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EEMA is much larger than EWM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA is much larger than EWM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWM | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $366M | $1.3B |
| Since | 1996 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 3.25% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.0% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.8% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.5% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.04% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -43.81% | -44.18% |
Similar to EWM and EEMA
Explore further