Screener
EWV vs HEWJ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan vs iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
Key differences
- HEWJ costs 0.46% less per year.
- HEWJ is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWV follows a inverse strategy; HEWJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, HEWJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWV | HEWJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $715M |
| Since | 2007 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 4.50% | 4.57% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -44.1% | +53.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -28.5% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -18.4% | +21.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.79 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.44% | 19.16% |
| Max drawdown | -90.00% | -31.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWV and HEWJ
Explore further