Screener
EWV vs SCJ
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan vs iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
- SCJ costs 0.45% less per year.
- SCJ is significantly larger than EWV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EWV follows a inverse strategy; SCJ uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SCJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EWV | SCJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7M | $235M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.50% | 2.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | asia pacific |
| Strategy | inverse | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -44.1% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -28.5% | +17.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -18.4% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.79 | 0.88 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.44% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -90.00% | -37.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EWV and SCJ
Explore further