Screener
EZA vs EWM
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF vs iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF
Key differences
Both EZA and EWM are equity ETFs. EZA charges 0.59% a year and EWM 0.50%. The main difference: EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- EWM costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last three years, EZA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EWM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZA | EWM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $693M | $366M |
| Since | 2003 | 1996 |
| Dividend yield | 6.12% | 3.25% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.5% | +20.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.9% | +14.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.86 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 31.44% | 14.04% |
| Max drawdown | -62.25% | -43.81% |
Similar to EZA and EWM
Explore further