Screener
EZJ vs EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets
Key differences
- EET costs 0.22% less per year.
- EET is significantly larger than EZJ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZJ covers asia pacific markets; EET covers emerging markets.
- Over the last 3 years, EET has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $48M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 1.45% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | +107.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | +37.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | +5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 39.49% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -69.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EET
Explore further