Screener
EZJ vs EFU
ProShares Ultra MSCI Japan vs ProShares UltraShort MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EFU costs 0.22% less per year.
- EZJ is significantly larger than EFU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZJ covers asia pacific markets; EFU covers global ex us.
- EZJ follows a leveraged strategy; EFU uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, EZJ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZJ | EFU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.17% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $0.9M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.77% | 5.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +57.6% | -32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +25.2% | -23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.5% | -16.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.69 | -0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.31% | 31.13% |
| Max drawdown | -58.63% | -90.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZJ and EFU
Explore further