Screener
EZMO vs IMOM
Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
- IMOM costs 0.45% less per year.
- IMOM is significantly larger than EZMO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZMO covers north america markets; IMOM covers global.
- EZMO follows a index tracking strategy; IMOM uses active selection.
- IMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZMO | IMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.83% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $153M |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +49.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.03 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.42% |
| Max drawdown | -9.23% | -45.74% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZMO and IMOM
Explore further