Screener
EZU vs IEFA
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF vs iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- IEFA costs 0.43% less per year.
- IEFA is significantly larger than EZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZU covers global markets; IEFA covers global ex us.
- EZU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZU | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $180.7B |
| Since | 2000 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 3.32% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +8.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 15.03% |
| Max drawdown | -41.37% | -34.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZU and IEFA
Explore further