Screener
EZU vs EFA
iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.18% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than EZU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EZU covers global markets; EFA covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EZU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EZU | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9.5B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2000 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 2.74% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.0% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.3% | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.93% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -41.37% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EZU and EFA
Explore further