Screener
FAD vs TMFS
First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.22% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAD follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAD | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.63% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $480M | $64M |
| Since | 2007 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.10% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.2% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.0% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.04 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.41% | 19.56% |
| Max drawdown | -37.25% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAD and TMFS
Explore further