Screener
FALN vs LQDH
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- FALN is significantly larger than LQDH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FALN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FALN | LQDH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $506M |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 6.42% | 6.11% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.6% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +8.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.0% | +5.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.34 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 2.72% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -24.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FALN and LQDH
Explore further