Screener
FALN vs AGRH
iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF vs iShares Interest Rate Hedged U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF
Key differences
- AGRH costs 0.12% less per year.
- FALN is significantly larger than AGRH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FALN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FALN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FALN | AGRH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.13% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.8B | $5M |
| Since | 2016 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 6.42% | 4.61% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +9.6% | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.6% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 1.43% |
| Max drawdown | -29.22% | -1.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FALN and AGRH
Explore further