Screener
FAS vs HIBS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.18% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than HIBS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAS follows a leveraged strategy; HIBS uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAS | HIBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $19M |
| Since | 2008 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 10.14% | 7.92% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.5% | -80.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | -62.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | -52.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | -0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.90% | 67.54% |
| Max drawdown | -85.99% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAS and HIBS
Explore further