Screener
FAS vs LABU
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.08% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than LABU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAS | LABU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $528M |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 10.14% | 0.69% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.5% | +246.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | +10.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | -32.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.48 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.90% | 75.02% |
| Max drawdown | -85.99% | -98.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAS and LABU
Explore further