Screener
FAS vs LABD
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- FAS costs 0.19% less per year.
- FAS is significantly larger than LABD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAS follows a leveraged strategy; LABD uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAS | LABD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 1.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $69M |
| Since | 2008 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 10.14% | 6.38% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -2.5% | -82.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +37.8% | -50.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.9% | -42.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | -0.52 |
| Volatility 1Y | 42.90% | 74.72% |
| Max drawdown | -85.99% | -99.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAS and LABD
Explore further