Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

FAS vs TECS

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares

FAS

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares

Direxion Funds

Annual cost

0.88%

Fund size

$2.1B

TECS

Direxion Daily Technology Bear 3X Shares

Direxion Funds

Annual cost

1.01%

Fund size

$80M

Key differences

  • FAS costs 0.13% less per year.
  • FAS is significantly larger than TECS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • FAS follows a leveraged strategy; TECS uses inverse.
  • Over the last 3 years, FAS has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

FASTECS
Annual cost (TER)0.88%1.01%
Fund size (AUM)$2.1B$80M
Since20082008
Dividend yield10.14%5.67%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y-2.5%-77.4%
CAGR 3Y+37.8%-64.6%
CAGR 5Y+4.9%-57.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.84-1.17
Volatility 1Y42.90%61.39%
Max drawdown-85.99%-99.99%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to FAS and TECS