Screener
FAZ vs TNA
Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
Key differences
- TNA is significantly larger than FAZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FAZ follows a inverse strategy; TNA uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FAZ | TNA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 1.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $120M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 3.00% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.8% | +130.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -38.5% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -27.5% | -5.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.84 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 43.24% | 57.15% |
| Max drawdown | -99.78% | -88.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FAZ and TNA
Explore further