Screener
TNA vs TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.06% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than TZA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TNA follows a leveraged strategy; TZA uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TNA | TZA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.05% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $270M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 4.33% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +130.8% | -67.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.7% | -46.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.2% | -30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | -0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.15% | 57.16% |
| Max drawdown | -88.09% | -99.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TNA and TZA
Explore further