Screener
FBCG vs TGRT
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
Key differences
- TGRT costs 0.19% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than TGRT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCG covers global markets; TGRT covers north america.
- FBCG follows a active selection strategy; TGRT uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCG | TGRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $1.2B |
| Since | 2020 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.08% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +24.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 16.15% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -22.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCG and TGRT
Explore further