Screener
FBCG vs TMFS
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FBCG costs 0.28% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FBCG covers global markets; TMFS covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| FBCG | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.57% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.2B | $64M |
| Since | 2020 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.04% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.2% | +0.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +32.5% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.4% | -0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.20 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 19.64% |
| Max drawdown | -43.56% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to FBCG and TMFS
Explore further