Screener
TMFS vs FELG
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- FELG costs 0.67% less per year.
- FELG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- FELG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | 15.53% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -23.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and FELG
Explore further